Re: Equity, some questions

Am 04.08.2016 um 09:54 schrieb Herman De Wael:
> This begs a more complete question:
>
> When should we award Av+, Av-, or no score at all.
> Given todays computer systems, there is no reason whatsoever to do one
> or the other.
> Within one session, the result is that "no score" does not affect the
> pair's average, while Av+ and Av- influence it positively or negatively,
> but by different amounts for different pairs. A top pair scoring Av-
> will suffer more than an average one.
>
> Perhaps we should define Av+ as average plus 10%?

If we did that, what would happen in the admittedly unrealistic case of 
someone scoring 95%? And, since A- would have to be average - 10%, why 
should someone with a high score still get a score much better than an 
average or bad pair, for the same offence? One offender receives 60%, 
the other 30? I don`t care whether they lose the same amount relative to 
their average. You can`t sell that to anybody, ever. What, he gets a 
better score when he acted as stupid as I did?? I do not think your idea 
is bad, but "unpopular" would be a very diplomatic description....

>
> Herman.
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml


_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml