Re: Claim
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <op.yrwoaxj6bd67ou@december2014> |
On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 02:32:08 -0500, Herman De Wael <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Frick wrote: >> If a player has left a trump and winner(s), if the trump is the ace >> he should play it, and if it is the two he should not. That assumes >> the player thinks through the position, when in fact we are supposed >> to consider lines of play that are careless. >> >> Anyway, that leaves 3 through King as ambiguous. To allow the player >> to calculate which trump is likely to be out, even though the player >> does not think a trump is out. That's allowing very careful, >> thoughtful play. >> > > Which is precisely what we don't want! > A player who "knows" that all trumps are out does not pull one. Ever. > Regardless of its size. > That is a much more simple rule and it caters for all possibilities. > And players won't criticize you for it. > > I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying it's easy. It's ludicrous to be > ruling claims on the basis of "claimer coould pull any card out of his > hat" That's not what the laws say, and it's not what players accept. > They will accept any logical card, in any order, but not things they > would "never" do. > > And making simple rules as to what constitutes normal play is not that > difficult. Only problem is, you've already done it, and you now believe > that you've done it correctly. I propose alternative simple rules, > which, I believe, are closer to what the laws mean and closer to what > players will accept. > > My simple rule for playing the end of a contract with cards that are all > high is: > "normal play is to play long suits first, high cards after, and trumps > last." With all suits played top-down. > > OK? Halfway. Trying to think back, my impression is that when drawing trumps would have been the correct play, players will often say they were going to draw trumps, but when I say they can't, as angry as they might be, it makes sense to everyone. When withholding a losing trump is the correct play, I can find a way they would lose control of the hand with careless play and lose more tricks than just the high trump. But then I am often finding a line of play that seems odd and the defenders are often not even seeing. So that's a reasonable change in the revoke procedures. I like it. Nice. But it's more important to me to be consistent and right, so I will stick with following the rules for now. To me, if they think every card in their hand is high, they do not care which card they play first. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml