Re: Fwd: A grate wall of no-Trump
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <op.yr8f9oplbd67ou@december2014> |
You had a reason for your lead. Is there anyone in the world that worries about this issue? North opens 1NT, alerts his partner's 2 Heart response as Jacoby Transfer, then passes with 3-3 in the majors. He catches partner forgetting Jacoby transfer. Worry about that. On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:05:32 -0500, Richard Hills <[email protected]> wrote: > At the table I chose the illogical alternative opening lead of the king of > hearts. If my illogical lead had been successful, due to dummy holding the > singleton queen of hearts, would that demonstrably suggest that I had > infracted the anti-peeking Law 74C5? > > No, it demonstrably suggests no such thing. One must always consider the > counter-factual. > > At the table partner held Ax in hearts, with declarer gambling that Qxx in > hearts was a stopper. The gamble paid off, 2NT making on my illogical king > of hearts lead instead of 2NT one off on any lower heart lead. > > Best wishes, > > Richard Hills > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Richard Hills* <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, December 2, 2016 > Subject: A grate wall of no-Trump > To: Bridge Laws Mailing List <[email protected]> > > > Butler Pairs > Dlr: South > Vul: Nil > > You, North, hold: > > JT2 > KJT87 > 92 > AQ9 > > East-West are playing an Aussie version of Standard American. > > South passes as dealer, then West opens 1D. You elect to overcall 1H. East > responds 2C. West rebids a natural and non-forcing 2NT. East chooses a > natural and non-forcing Pass. > > What is your opening lead? > > Best wishes, > > Richard Hills _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml