Re: Wanted: Alternate wording for Law 16Bb1(a)
Peter Smulders <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 12:00 6-2-2017, Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> wrote: >Cc: Bridge Laws Mailing List <[email protected]> >To: "Timothy N. Hill" <[email protected]> >References: ><CAHkRE_1SXunQ=POLUVJDOBgB9nfRjavMwP5NrRBGOktQuSsZ4A@mail.gmail.com> > <op.v853jxifbd67ou@bob-hp> <[email protected]> > <CAHkRE_2K1BhAx+zJRRXwnmvn2uxoBm=3iP=eQVPvx-XFH47uxw@mail.gmail.com> > <[email protected]> > <CAHkRE_2LDx5GXjB-utKKB8_ez22XsPvpW8_y0ReQofbEvj88FQ@mail.gmail.com> >In-Reply-To: ><CAHkRE_2LDx5GXjB-utKKB8_ez22XsPvpW8_y0ReQofbEvj88FQ@mail.gmail.com> >Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 23:01:43 -0700 >Reply-To: Bridge Laws Mailing List <[email protected]> >Message-ID: ><CAHkRE_3aMc=2zLG_X+nWdy5OOrK0r5-C5En7b8TMxRv5G6zC_g@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137aa56b1d52d0547d65df1 >Subject: Re: [BLML] Wanted: Alternate wording for Law 16Bb1(a) >Message: 1 > >A few people pointed out a logical flaw in the "unless there is no >logical alternative" text. Here's a new version based on a >suggestion by Andy Bowles: > >A player may not choose a call or play that is demonstrably >suggested over another by unauthorized information unless the other >call or play is not a logical alternative. "unless ... not" : this double negatives is confusing to simple minds like mine. I suggest A player may not choose a call or play that is demonstrably suggested over another by unauthorized information if the other call or play is a logical alternative. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml