Re: Jeeves the Butler
Volker Walther <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:45:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If you have the tools to stop the bidding on a low level, (eg. Drury or workable runouts) I would probably judge (depending on local regulations) that you are using HUM, if you open such a weak hand in third position. I would decide the same way if dealer is bidding incredible low in a so called "natural system". Volker Am 28.07.2017 um 14:17 schrieb Robert Park: > > But are not some psyching situations sufficiently well known to be > considered almost part of "just bridge?" Third-seat 1M openings when > playing Drury, for example. Or 1S replies to 1H when holding a very weak > hand with heart support? Are there others of this ilk? > > I seen to recall someone describing a psyching opportunity or 2 when > replying to 1NT openings. These certainly exist when not vul responding > a weak or mini-1NT...especially if you have workable run-outs when a > double comes back to you. > > --Bob Park > > > On 7/28/17 12:17 AM, Richard Hills wrote: >> The shorthand word "psychic" appears in Law 40B2(a)(v). But the more >> useful expanded description "deviate from his side's announced >> understandings" appears in Law 40C1. >> >> A true psyche is when "partner has no more reason than the opponents >> to be aware of the deviation". (Note that Law 40B2(a)(v) nevertheless >> renders some true psyches illegal.) But a concealed partnership >> understanding pseudo-psyche is created by repeated deviations, for >> example the oxymoron "mandatory psyche". >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Richard Hills >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 27 Jul 2017, at 4:33 PM, Gordon Rainsford <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> I’m struggling to see the Bridge Laws point in this thread. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >>> Windows 10 >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Richard Hills <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *27 July 2017 05:13 >>> *To: *Bridge Laws Mailing List <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject: *Re: [BLML] Jeeves the Butler >>> >>> >>> >>> Jeeves neither "obviously" psyches 1H nor "obviously" passes. Rather >>> Jeeves has already observed the traits of the opponents (Law 16A2). >>> >>> >>> >>> Due to Bertie Wooster's misadventures in the earlier matches of the >>> Swiss this round's opponents are the weakest pair in the field. >>> Furthermore the opponents play a home-grown idiosyncratic bidding system. >>> >>> >>> >>> Hence Jeeves chose to Pass rather than psyche. Shenanigans occurred >>> in the opponents' uncontested auction, resulting in a hopeless 6NT, >>> +300 to the good guys. If Jeeves had psyched 1H, then the opponents >>> would have been forced to revert to natural bidding, resulting in a >>> sensible 3NT, -600 to the good guys. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> >>> >>> Richard Hills >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> >>> >>> > On 25 Jul 2017, at 6:46 PM, Herman De Wael <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > obviously, 1 heart! >>> >>> > altough I would consider passing. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Richard Hills wrote: >>> >>> >> Swiss Butler Pairs >>> >>> >> Dlr: West >>> >>> >> Vul: North-South >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> The bidding has gone: Pass - (Pass) - ? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You, East, hold: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> T96 >>> >>> >> QT6 >>> >>> >> T973 >>> >>> >> 876 >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> What call do you make? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Best wishes, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Richard Hills >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> Blml mailing list >>> >>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> >> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> --- >>> >>> >> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. >>> >>> >> http://www.avg.com >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> >>> > Blml mailing list >>> >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Blml mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Blml mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Blml mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > -- Volker Walther _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml