Re: inn err Ni manor
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:17:32 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Richard Hills wrote: > > In my opinion, reading the new 75B1 and 75B3 together demonstrates that an accurate explanation to an opponent's later enquiry does NOT count as a correction of partner's earlier misexplanation. > I fail to see how you can have this opinion. If it quacks like a duck ... The "accurate explanation" quacks. Although this does not say literally "that was a duck" it clearly implies that it was. Herman. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml