Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Steve Willner <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:21:56 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2017-10-27 12:01 PM, Herman De Wael wrote: > Teams > decl you dummy part > 2Cl Pass 2Sp Pass 2Cl=2-suiter 2Sp=relay > 3He Pass 3Sp Pass natural > 3NT All Pass > two clubs is strong, one- or two-suited. > two spades is an asking relay. > 3 Hearts and 3 spades have not been alerted. So 2C was artificial and forcing? How strong: GF or as typical in US 9+ tricks? Could it be balanced? (And why the *!@&# did I pass over 2C?! Presumably I've just substituted in for the player who was comatose during the auction.) Did 2S guarantee a trick or so in hand? What were responder's other choices? I'm guessing 2D would have been negative (or neutral?), but what about 2H? Would 3C and 3D by opener have been natural? It's odd to describe 2S as a relay when the relay responses are natural. It seems to me the 2S bid must have shown something specific. > Sp K Q 9 7 5 2 > He Q J 10 8 > Di 9 > Cl 6 3 At IMPs, a heart lead is probably useless given the 3H bid, but I can see a case for any of the other three suits (though probably least for a D). If leading S, either high or a spot could be right. If we're beating this, partner will have a couple of useful cards, so maybe a "give-nothing-away" heart is best after all. If this is a ruling problem, on the information so far, any suit (except _possibly_ D) is a LA, and no suit is a serious error. Those may of course change with additional information. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml