Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Oct 2017 23:36:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jerry Fusselman wrote: > Then the original explanation of 2Cl was MI. At what point was it corrected? > Sorry, no it was not - Steve asked for more explanations, which I gave him, like the original player would have got if he had asked. > What other options besides the relay did dummy have on the first round? > I presume that 2Di would be negative. But 2Sp was explained as an asking relay (so not shoving anything). I do not know what would have been the difference between 2He and 2Sp. > What do the nonalerts show in your jurisdiction? > natural bids. If you ask, he will say that he's shown 5 hearts and partner shows 4 spades. > Are questions about the auction without a "need to know right now" > risky and subject to penalty? > no, since you're behind screens. But this is all the information you are likely to extract. > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Herman De Wael <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sorry, not complete enough for some: >> >> two clubs is strong, one- or two-suited. >> two spades is an asking relay. >> 3 Hearts and 3 spades have not been alerted. >> And if partner has asked anything, you ould not know (screens!) >> Herman. >> >> Herman De Wael wrote: >>> They are vulnerable, you're in second seat, after the bidding: >>> >>> decl you dummy part >>> 2Cl Pass 2Sp Pass 2Cl=2-suiter 2Sp=relay >>> 3He Pass 3Sp Pass natural >>> 3NT All Pass >>> >>> And you have to lead from: >>> >>> Sp K Q 9 7 5 2 >>> He Q J 10 8 >>> Di 9 >>> Cl 6 3 >>> >>> Your lead? >>> > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > http://www.avg.com > > _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml