Re: In between Law 23

On 11/7/2017 3:29 PM, Jan Peach wrote:
> Does anyone seriously think that ... adding a 10+ suit ... isn’t a
> change to meaning?

As posted here, many of us think adding an extremely rare hand type is 
not a change to meaning.  (I expect everyone will agree that adding a 
common but different hand type is a change to meaning.)  Where to draw 
the line is not clear, and I hope there will be official guidance.

I also don't understand why you think L23C wouldn't apply if the rare 
hand type changes "the outcome of the board."
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml