Re: if what
Steve Willner <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:43:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2018-01-25 7:46 PM, Robert Frick wrote: > I decided that trying to remember Smith Echo was a bridge reason. The word "demonstrable" that precedes "bridge reason" is significant. It's easy to demonstrate that deciding between a high card and a low one is a bridge reason. Between two low cards... not so much. > I don't have information about how long declarer thought to the first > trick. I have less sympathy for him if he deliberately played > quickly. I agree with that. Also with Mike Amos' cogent answer, though I don't suppose any two people would agree on the exact weightings. The full deal and all the conditions are needed even to make a start on that. The weightings should be based on "had the infraction not occurred" (L12B1). _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml