Las Vegas 2014 case N4
Richard Hills <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:21:45 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In this case the declaring side had misinformed the defending side during the auction. The declaring side corrected their misexplanation at the end of the auction. But neither side summoned the Director (as both sides were obliged to do) until well after the conclusion of play. Hence the Director refused to adjust the score, citing Law 10B. On the other hand, the Appeals Committee ignored Law 10B without giving any reason for doing so, therefore adjusted the score. Best wishes, Richard Hills Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml