Re: Is an agreement an agreement?

"Petrus Schuster OSB" <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:24:34 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.games.bridge.laws
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 21:06:45 +0200, Robert Frick <[email protected]>  
wrote:

>
> Your partner opens 2 Diamonds, RHO asks, and you explain it as a weak  
> two. RHO bids 2NT and it is your call. You hold
>
> X
> Qx
> KJxxx
> 98xxx
>
>
> You are playing with your partner for the first time. He came late, so  
> there was no time to talk about hardly anything. You gave him your card,  
> which said 2 Diamonds is weak. It's not clear how much time he had to  
> look at the card, but it wasn't much, and it's not clear what he read.  
> Or remembered. It's probably more common here to play 2D as Flannery,  
> 4-5 in the majors with an opening hand.
>
> So, first question, what do you bid?
>
> The player decided to pass. I think that's a reasonable bid, given the  
> high probability that partner might have the Flannery hand.
>
> And, second question, did she fulfill her legal obligations to explain  
> partner's bid? If not, what should she have said?

What she knows: that the card says weak, but that they did not discuss it  
and partner may not have noticed or remembered.


> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
>


-- 
Erstellt mit Operas E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml