Re: Is an agreement an agreement?
"Petrus Schuster OSB" <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:24:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 21:06:45 +0200, Robert Frick <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your partner opens 2 Diamonds, RHO asks, and you explain it as a weak > two. RHO bids 2NT and it is your call. You hold > > X > Qx > KJxxx > 98xxx > > > You are playing with your partner for the first time. He came late, so > there was no time to talk about hardly anything. You gave him your card, > which said 2 Diamonds is weak. It's not clear how much time he had to > look at the card, but it wasn't much, and it's not clear what he read. > Or remembered. It's probably more common here to play 2D as Flannery, > 4-5 in the majors with an opening hand. > > So, first question, what do you bid? > > The player decided to pass. I think that's a reasonable bid, given the > high probability that partner might have the Flannery hand. > > And, second question, did she fulfill her legal obligations to explain > partner's bid? If not, what should she have said? What she knows: that the card says weak, but that they did not discuss it and partner may not have noticed or remembered. > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > -- Erstellt mit Operas E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml