Re: equity
Roger Pewick <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:44:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BN6PR08MB34274A9FE221A9198FCCB7FBB4910@BN6PR08MB3427.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> |
--===============0889047101== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR08MB34274A9FE221A9198FCCB7FBB4910BN6PR08MB3427namp_" --_000_BN6PR08MB34274A9FE221A9198FCCB7FBB4910BN6PR08MB3427namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How did the TD verify the occurrence of an established revoke? Regards Roger pewick From: Jean-Pierre Rocafort<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 11:59 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Blml] equity This case of revoke occured in a national pairs competition: N-all K1065 J952 5 J1072 QJ732 A84 - A1043 1098 A73 AK653 Q98 9 KQ876 KQJ642 4 following a competitive auction, north was declarer in 5H doubled. C8 won by CK SQ wins 2nd trick D8 won by DA D3 won by dummy's K HK wins 5th trick then declarer ruffs D4 with H9, overruffed by H10! and declarer claims 8 tricks some time later (too late for L64A1) the revoke is discovered so un adjusted score is needed. declarer calls for 9 tricks, arguing he should not lose H10. defenser argues declarer misplayed the hand, he should have first played a 2nd round of trump to his J. as he played, D ruffed then low H, east should take HA then force dummy with a club preventing him from removing trumps. declarer argues back, first that somebody who is not able to follow suit should not be deemed able to find a complex defense, 2nd that had the revoke been corrected, H10 would have been a penalized card and east could not have played HA on the next trick. How many tricks should be awarded to declarer? jpr -- ---------------------------- Jean-Pierre Rocafort 4 bis impasse Trey-Dousteau 31100 Toulouse France --_000_BN6PR08MB34274A9FE221A9198FCCB7FBB4910BN6PR08MB3427namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:sc= hemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/of= fice/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"= > <meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"> <style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:#954F72; text-decoration:underline;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style> </head> <body lang=3D"EN-US" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"#954F72"> <div class=3D"WordSection1"> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">How did the TD verify the occurrence of an establish= ed revoke?</p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">Regards</p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">Roger pewick</p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> <div style=3D"mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E= 1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> <p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"border:none;padding:0in"><b>From: </b><a hr= ef=3D"mailto:[email protected]">Jean-Pierre Rocafort</a><br> <b>Sent: </b>Thursday, January 31, 2019 11:59 AM<br> <b>To: </b><a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br> <b>Subject: </b>[Blml] equity</p> </div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">This case of revoke occured in a national pairs comp= etition:<br> <br> N-all K1065<br> J952<br> 5<br> J1072<br> QJ732 A84<br> - &n= bsp; A1043<br> 1098  = ; A73<br> AK653 &nbs= p; Q98<br> 9<br> KQ876<br> KQJ642<br> 4<br> <br> following a competitive auction, north was declarer in 5H doubled.<br> C8 won by CK<br> SQ wins 2nd trick<br> D8 won by DA<br> D3 won by dummy's K<br> HK wins 5th trick<br> then declarer ruffs D4 with H9, overruffed by H10! and declarer claims 8 <b= r> tricks<br> some time later (too late for L64A1) the revoke is discovered so un <br> adjusted score is needed.<br> declarer calls for 9 tricks, arguing he should not lose H10.<br> defenser argues declarer misplayed the hand, he should have first played <b= r> a 2nd round of trump to his J. as he played, D ruffed then low H, east <br> should take HA then force dummy with a club preventing him from removing <b= r> trumps.<br> declarer argues back, first that somebody who is not able to follow suit <b= r> should not be deemed able to find a complex defense, 2nd that had the <br> revoke been corrected, H10 would have been a penalized card and east <br> could not have played HA on the next trick.<br> How many tricks should be awarded to declarer?<br> jpr<br> <br> -- <br> ----------------------------<br> Jean-Pierre Rocafort<br> 4 bis impasse Trey-Dousteau<br> 31100 Toulouse France<br> <br> </p> </div> </body> </html> --_000_BN6PR08MB34274A9FE221A9198FCCB7FBB4910BN6PR08MB3427namp_-- --===============0889047101== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml --===============0889047101==--