Re: bridge reason for hesitation?
Steve Willner <[email protected]> Mon, 6 May 2019 17:18:27 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/6/2019 5:03 PM, Herman De Wael wrote: > But the question remains - is an opponent entitled to know what you are > thinking about? EK addressed both issues years ago. Maybe something has changed to make is opinions no longer relevant, but I don't know what. On the above, EK's answer was no. You can't pretend to have a problem when you don't, but if an opponent misjudges what your problem was, that's his own problem. EK didn't address the "duration of pause" issue I mentioned in my previous message, but that's rarely an issue. > Something else that occurs to me regularly comes to mind. > When having to make both the final pass and the opening lead, I never > put down the actual pass until I've figured out what to lead. ... > Am I allowed to combined two pauses for thought into one, thereby not > revealing to declarer what it was that I was thinking about? TBW (probably EK but maybe not) thought that what they called "time-shifting" was illegal, perhaps with an allowance for a pause to plan at the first trick and maybe later if there's a surprise. What I've tried to do is discipline myself to pause before all opening leads, even when I have the most obvious lead ever. Also to pause briefly at every turn to call when, based on the auction and not the cards I actually hold, I might have a choice to make. I'm not very good at this but would like to think I'm improving. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml