Re: XML was RE: RE: A portable preferences library

Gareth Lewin wrote:

> How is that valid ? That's the same opengl/directx linux/windows type
> argument. In what way is it related or productive to the discussion ? I
> prefer msxml mainly because everyone with IE6 on their machine has it, less
> to download. And Xerces (admittedly I haven't tried it in 2 years) had an

There are of course different versions of  msxml, just installed one
software which required me to fetch an update from Microsoft.
(the software was actually clever enough to automatically download it,
except that it was not clever enough to do the download for
non English localized WindowsXP, and I think the required download
package is not that clearly named on Microsoft site...)


		Eero






-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Gamedevlists-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gamedevlists-general
Archives:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=557