Re: Variables scope

The way I've worked around this in the past has been by redefining for as
follows:
#define for if (false) {} else for

Yes, it's a hideously ugly hack, but so is the problem in the first place.
I've never had any problems because of it.

// Kristoffer

From: "Jorrit Tyberghein" <[email protected]>
> CAVEY GERARD wrote:
>
> >Hi there
> >
> >Few days ago i switched to Visual c++ 6.0 and this is what i discovered.
> >The compiler accept the following C++ code :
> >
> >//first loop
> > for(unsigned long b=0;b<MeshesArray[current].VerticesCount;b++)
> > {
> > ...//processing
> > }
> >//second loop
> > for( b=0;b<not_used*3;b++)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> >But i thiink i should write the second FOR like this "for(unsigned long
> >b=0;b<not_used*3;b++)" (i mean i should redeclare 'b' because it came out
of
> >scope)
> >When i tried the compiler answered me "error redefinition ..." !!!
> >Did i forget to set an option ;it is a bit strange isn t it?
> >
> >Greetings
> >GC
> >
> >
>
> The best way to avoid this bug in VC 6 is to put 'unsigned long b'
> before the first
> loop like this:
>
>     unsigned long b;
>     for (b = 0 ; ...)
>     ...
>     for (b = 0 ; ...)
>
> We had the same problem in Crystal Space.
>
> Greetings,
>



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Gamedevlists-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gamedevlists-general
Archives:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=557