Re: Clean way of generalizing CDECL

--- Brian Hook <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > Why don't you try:
> >
> > void __attribute__((cdecl)) foo( int x, int y, int z );
> >
> > :)
> 
> Err...hmmm, is that standard across all GCC incarnations?  The man
> pages I read indicated it had to be a suffix, but if not...well, that
> simplifies things =)

Hmm... I'm not totally sure. I think the documentation
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Extensions.html) is not completely
clear, but apparently that works at least on recent gcc versions. I've been
using that for some time. So, please, let me know if you find any issue!

Thanks,

--
Ignacio Castaño
[email protected]



	
	
		
______________________________________________
Yahoo! lanza su nueva tecnología de búsquedas
¿te atreves a comparar?
http://busquedas.yahoo.es


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Gamedevlists-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gamedevlists-general
Archives:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=557