Re: Number of Go positions is itself a Go position

John Tromp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.devel.go
Message-ID <CAOU__fzyYRZSBEFAMNfpU-2nEDei-hL-DHGO6-aCw3dRo7Mahg@mail.gmail.com>
dear David,

> To quote from: http://tromp.github.io/go/legal.html
>
> It should come as no surprise that L19, viewed as a position, is itself
> illegal.
>
> In this absolute form this statement got disproved in my German Go Forum
> article at
> http://www.dgob.de/yabbse/index.php?topic=5935.msg216064#msg216064

My form is not as absolute as you make it out to be. The absolute form would be:

It should come as no surprise that L19, mapped to a position by laying
out the 361 consecutive
trits to a path on the 19x19 grid, and choosing which trit represents
empty, is itself illegal.

That would indeed be a ridiculous claim:-)

> Basically it's using a more natural Hilbert-based curve instead of an
> arbitrary row-wise mapping which doesn't take the topology of the Go-grid
> into account. Let me now if you need any of the details in German
> translated.

The fact that you can describe my mapping simply as "row-wise" shows how it
is quite non-arbitrary. Your Hilbert curve on the contrary can hardly
be described
in a much simpler way than in its full explicit form, betraying its
arbitrariness...

Trotzdem, gratuliere zu deinem legale Kurve!

kind regards,
-John
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.