RE: Advanced Topic - Doing it differently.

--- Hiddukel <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you are trying to prove that D can do some things that C can't you don't
> need to, after all D is basically an extension of C and C++ so naturally it
> is going to extend the possibilities.  If it didn't then there would be
> absolutely no use for it.  I would like to see you write D code for dynamic
> class loading however, because even the D documentation admits that it can't
> do this but C# and Java can.


Yeah, you can dynamically load classes in C++ too, so long as the interface the
class uses is compiled into the non-dynamic code.

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1
GCS/L/C/O d-(+) s++: a-- C+++$>++++ UBLS++++$ 
P+++(--)$ L+++>++++ E--- W+>++$ N !o K? w(--) !O 
M- !V PS+ PE(++) Y+ PGP->+ t+ 5 X+() R(+) tv+@ 
b++(+++) !DI+++ D G(-) e>+++$ h---() r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger 
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. 
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest
-- 
ROM mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe here ->>> http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom