Re: Const vs Non-Const.

On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:00 PM, Nron Ksr wrote:
My understanding from this is that Valnir was referring to v1 or v2 of his
 MUD, not v1 or v2 of OLC.  :)

> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 01:47 pm, Dale Kingston wrote:
> Since version v1 or v2.... what do you think 2.0 is? V2.0?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Valnir
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 8:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Const vs Non-Const.
>
> That's good to know, but our mud is about 10 yrs old, and on it's 5th 
> major
> revision already. It has had OLC since around v1 or v2, and has had many
> custom mods done to it, so just plugging in OLC 2.0 wouldn't work too 
> well.
> Thanks for the FYI though, and I'll keep that in mind if I ever decide to
> build one from scratch. :)
>
> - Valnir
>

 <snipped>

100% correct. I was referencing my MUD and not the OLC version.

- Valnir

-- 
ROM mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe here ->>> http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom