Re: Proposed ScummVM 1.9.0 schedule

Hi Sev,

That sounds good to me. I agree that, considering it's only just been
merged, it's probably safer for Cloud support not to go in this release.
Likewise DM and Titanic - both still need quite a bit more work until
they're even ready for testing, let alone official support.

Paul.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Eugene Sandulenko <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> It is time to start the 1.9.0 preparations.
>
> So far we have two new engines coming as supported in this release. Maybe
> I'll be confident enough to announce WAGE as well, but most probably not.
>
> Also, I would like to have Spark autoupdates enabled on Windows, as Mac
> was a positive experience, and in August we had 1700 update check to our
> site.
>
> Cloud support is not yet ready for the prime time.
>
> What do you think about the following proposed schedule of the 1.9.0
> release:
>
>   September 12, Release testing announced
>   September 26, branch-1-9-0 created, goes into feature freeze
>   October 10, tagging
>   October 17, release
>
> Any adjustments, recommendations regarding some feature A which we should
> wait?
>
>
> Eugene
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scummvm-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Scummvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel