Re: The new Buildbot: what’s happ ening, what needs to happen

On 21/12/2017 6:58 PM, Colin Snover wrote:
>> On a side note, I'm still waiting for a response to my email about
>> whether Windows XP support still works in the Windows build of ScummVM
>> 2.0.0, since it was mentioned as been built with mingw-w64. mingw-w64
>> dropped Windows XP support, according to note on the mingw-w64
>> compilation guide on the ScummVM wiki.
>
> In order to keep things on topic, anything not directly related to this
> Buildbot discussion, such as the existence of other manually created
> builds or missed responses to other emails, I would encourage you to
> create a separate thread or follow up directly with anyone else if you
> feel your needs have not been fully addressed. If you feel that this
> information is directly applicable to the discussion regarding the new
> Buildbot and the proposed worker image requirement, I would appreciate
> it if you could provide more clarification as to how it is so.

Just a quick response on this point, since it could be very important. 
The new Buildbot was used to build the Windows release of ScummVM 2.0.0, 
which uses the mingw-w64 compiler suite. I wanted to confirm Windows XP 
is still supported by the Windows release of ScummVM 2.0.0, as mingw-w64 
is stated to have dropped Windows XP support on the ScummVM wiki ( 
http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.php/Compiling_ScummVM/MinGW-w64 ).

I tried emailing you directly on 11th December 2017, requesting to 
ensure Windows XP support was still working in the Windows release of 
ScummVM 2.0.0, as mingw-w64 was stated as been used for the Windows 
build on IRC.

I just want to make sure Windows XP support has not been broken, in the 
Windows release of ScummVM 2.0.0.

_______________________________________________
Scummvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel