Re: Revisiting coding convention for empty loop body

On 21 April 2018 at 12:54, Paul Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hmmm.. if we'd need to do some form of change to existing code to , I'd be
> more in favor of mandating the use of {} rather than the semicolon, as
> opposed to requiring an entire comment just to say that it's intentional
> that the loop doesn't have a body. It would convey the same information, in
> a more compact form. And it would have the advantage of bypassing the
> question of whether semicolons should have spaces in front of them.
>

I like this idea much more. I would even adjust the conventions to reflect
it.


Eugene

_______________________________________________
Scummvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel