Re: time budgets and continuous integration

We switched from CrouiseControl to TeamCity about a year ago and we're
pretty comfortable with it. But they are mostly web projects.

Now, how do you warrantee a constant framerate by using CI? Is it possible?
What tools are there? Sorry, I don't really have much experience on this.

Thanks.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Joachim Ante <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I recommend TeamCity. (http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/) It has very
> good support for distributing build steps, has pre-commit tests and is
> generally really nice to use. Unlike Hudson it doesn't run out of memory
> when your log files / nunit xml results files become huge and other assorted
> small issues that simply drove us nuts.
>
> Joachim Ante
>
>    Er… Hudson **is** open source, no? J
>
>
>
>    It looks good, I’ve been keeping an eye on it for a while.
> Unfortunately, it is written in Java, which makes me personally very…
> unenthusiastic… about touching the code.
>
>
>
>    The main issue for me with CC.NET was that it just doesn’t support
> distributed building out-of-the-box, which FWIW Hudson does.
>
>
>
> /Stefan
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
> *On Behalf Of *Jim Tilander
> *Sent:* 01 February 2010 07:30
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Sweng-Gamedev] time budgets and continuous integration
>
>
>
>
>
> Definately check out Hudson for CI infrastructure.  It was *so* easy
> to setup compared to CruiseControl.  I had CI builds going for Mac and
> PC in about 15 minutes!  <http://hudson-ci.org/>  Hudson is a Java
> application, so it requires Java on the build machine.
>
>
> I would disagree, while there are a lot of promising CI packages out there,
> most of them fail due to the fact that they do not come with source. the
> CC.NET source code is far from perfect, but it's there and you can modify
> it. Doing anything outside the beaten path will bring you into the need to
> make your own plugins. We've written several to fit our development process
> better. With a close source commercial package you're at the mercy of their
> whims, or if you can bring pressure on them to implement your changes.
>
> /j
>
> --
> Introspection is just a ladder for people who have dug them an object
> oriented hole.
> _______________________________________________
> Sweng-Gamedev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.midnightryder.com/listinfo.cgi/sweng-gamedev-midnightryder.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sweng-Gamedev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.midnightryder.com/listinfo.cgi/sweng-gamedev-midnightryder.com
>
>

_______________________________________________
Sweng-Gamedev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.midnightryder.com/listinfo.cgi/sweng-gamedev-midnightryder.com