RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'

Maybe on some compilers, but it's not guaranteed.  The order of argument
evaluation to functions is not specified by the C++ standard - it's left
up to the implementations.

j

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Lewin, Gareth
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [GD-Windows] VC.NET 'Optimization'

I fail to see why this worries you, the optimiser is making a (valid)
assumption about your code, and generating the fastest sequence it can.

As a side note, just flip the order of your params to printf, that
should give you want you want. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
yogiwp
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [GD-Windows] VC.NET 'Optimization'

> ----------------------------------------------------
>     timer.Restart();
>     printf( "time=%f, result=%d\n", timer.GetElapsed(), fibonacci(42) 
> );
> ----------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Gamedevlists-windows mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gamedevlists-windows
Archives:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_idU5