Re: Different approach by the West Mids police
William Highfield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Clark, Now who's putting words into who's mouth. "Acting suspicious" is not a death sentence. Acting like a suspcious terrorist might well be. This guy wasn't "acting suspicious" while shoplifting a sweater from a department store. He was acting suspcious coming out of a building under survellience, he acted suspcious when questioned, he acted suspicious when he fled, and he acted suspicious when he allegedly jumped the turnstile to board a crowded train. Now, given all of those parameters, the cops on the scene - not you or I - had to make the call, and they made it. Right or wrong, they had to make the tough decisions. Now, if you DON'T want them to make that call, WHY GIVE THEM GUNS? If you do give them guns, then they have to allowed to use them when they think public safety is at risk, and if so, you have to figure that occassionally, tragedy may result. It isn't an easy job, and they don't deserve to be accused of making street executions. But we'll have to differ in that aspect, I guess. I tend to give cops the benefit of the doubt, reserving criticism until after the investigation. You accuse them of being no better than assassins and jackbooted thugs and frankly I don't think anything short of the guy having a bomb would convince you otherwise ... and maybe not even then. Had he had a bomb, would you be criticising the police for killing him? I'm betting you would. -- Bill Highfield St Cloud, Florida, USA! Top Choice Videos and Music ~12,000VHS ~4,000DVD ~2,000CD in stock! We special order & We ship ANYWHERE! Visit one of our online stores! http://stores.ebay.com/topchoicevideos?refid=store http://www.amazon.com/shops/topchoicevideos