Re: Re: By the way, Bill

"Peter J Richardson" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:37:32 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat
Message-ID	<070101c5b272$ca7358a0$e094fd3e@YOURF8C329D8D5>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William Highfield" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [CAT23-Achat] Re: By the way, Bill

> Peter,
>
> Iraq violated the 1991 armistice, so this is not actually a new war, but
> a continuation of the 1991 war.  If the 1991 war was legal, then so to
> is this one.

That might be so had the UNSC not passed some new resolutions to muddy the waters legally. UNSC1441 specifically 
required further Iraqi breaches to be brought back to the security council for resolution and as we know that 
requirement was ignored because Bush/Blair did not wish to risk a French veto.

Regards
Peter 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/7tRolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->