Re: Re: By the way, Bill
"Peter J Richardson" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:49:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <01f101c5b324$71664710$7194fd3e@YOURF8C329D8D5> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "William Highfield" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:19 PM Subject: Re: [CAT23-Achat] Re: By the way, Bill >A further clarification. I was not opposed to US involvement in the > Balkans; I was opposed to us taking the lead when a European Union sat > by and did nothing. THEY should have been taking the lead, and we > should have supported them as NATO allies. Instead, we had to do the > heavy lifting while the rest of NATO - as usual - sent token forces. As I recall the US wanted to take the lead, but refused to commit ground forces, preferring instead to command other people's. > Europe is big enough and strong enough to take care of their own back > yard. They should do so and free us up to handle the rest of the world > that Europe would just as soon ignore. Britain did not have any vital interests tied up in Yugoslavia any more than the USA did. Regards Peter ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/7tRolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->