Re: Re: Is Media Phone Tapping Acceptable?
"Peter J Richardson" <[email protected]> Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:19:24 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <02f201c6be22$b20d7630$0a90fd3e@YOURF8C329D8D5> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "David E Watson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 2:27 AM Subject: [CAT23-Achat] Re: Is Media Phone Tapping Acceptable? > Well Pete, good versus bad is another debate isn't it? and extremely > subjectionable. > Wether a law is 'right' or not depends upon the goal in question. That depends on whether you consider some methods to be beyond the pale. For methods that are beyond the pale the goal is irrelevant when deciding whether it is justified or not. I'm not sure that I would argue that in this case, there may be times when phone-tapping is acceptable, though ferriting out the details of the private lives of the British Royal Family is perhaps not one of them. > WHO is it defending..and is it succeeding in its goal? The News of the World's bank balance and whether their papers are selling do you mean? :-) Regards Peter > > Dave > > > > --- In [email protected], "Peter J Richardson" > <pjrich.1962@...> wrote: >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael Cuffaro" <michael.cuffaro@...> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:49 PM >> Subject: Re: [CAT23-Achat] Is Media Phone Tapping Acceptable? >> >> >> >I don't see why there is any debate. They are breaking (not >> > bending) the law are they not? >> >> They are. I was inviting discussion on whether the law in question > was a good law or a bad law. >> >> Regards >> Peter >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Peter J Richardson <pjrich.1962@...> >> > Sent: Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:15:35AM +0100 >> > To: >> > Subject: [CAT23-Achat] Is Media Phone Tapping Acceptable? >> > >> > This story may have some consequences for press freedom: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4776427.stm >> > >> > So do you consider this fair punishment, or censorship of the > media? Would it make a difference to you if it >> > were (a) Tony Blair, or (b) Heather Mills McCartney, rather than > the Royals who had their phone conversations >> > bugged and reported in the press? >> > >> > For my part I don't have much sympathy with the News of the > World here. >> > >> > Regards >> > Peter >> > >> > >> > Community email addresses: >> > Post message: [email protected] >> > Subscribe: [email protected] >> > Unsubscribe: [email protected] >> > List owner: [email protected] >> > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Community email addresses: > Post message: [email protected] > Subscribe: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > List owner: [email protected] > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >