Re: Re: Nonsense

The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath
-Mark 2: 27

For this command which I enjoin on you today is not too mysterious and remote for you. It is not up in the sky, that you should say, 'Who will go up in the sky to get it for us and tell us of it, that we may carry it out?' Nor is it across the sea, that you should say, 'Who will cross the sea to get it for us and tell us of it, that we may carry it out?' No, it is something very near to you, already in your mouths and in your hearts; you have only to carry it out.
-Deuteronomy 30:11-14 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:12:09AM -0000
To: To [email protected]
Subject: [CAT23-Achat] Re: Nonsense

>From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situationist> :

"People who talk about revolution and class struggle without 
referring explicitly to everyday life, without understanding what is 
subversive about love and what is positive in the refusal of 
constraints, such people have a corpse in their mouth"- Raoul 
Vaneigem, The Revolution Of Everyday Life 

(K)ing Mobber

--- In [email protected], Michael Cuffaro 
<michael.cuffaro@...> wrote:
>
> > writing strange anti-life Commandments all the effing time. 
Spending your time saying Thou 
> > Shalt Not ; Yes We Fucking Shall, Vicar, 
> 
> From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_liberty> :
> The philosophical concept of negative liberty refers to an 
individual's liberty from being subjected to the authority of 
others. In this negative sense, one is considered free to the extent 
to which no person interferes with his or her activity.
> 
> From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_rights> :
> Within the philosophy of human rights, some philosophers and 
political scientists see a distinction between positive and negative 
rights. According to this view a positive right imposes an 
obligation on others and the state to do certain things, while a 
negative right merely obliges others and the state to refrain from 
certain activities.
>