Re: Re: Game history aproximation...
Gregory Alexopoulos <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:13:11 +0000 (GMT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.game-chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Michael Cuffaro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You can go on your Game Boy, your PS2, or your > computer and play games > > to a conclusion in a few minutes, hours, or at > most, days. You do not > > need to figure how to communicate effectively with > anyone, just learn > > the rules and go to it. > > But that has *always* been the case - maybe not on > the internet, but there are plenty of games > around that take only a few minutes. Pick any card > game, for example. Not really, no. The target group of card games and strategy games are quite different. People who play Dip are likely to get addicted to games like Civilisation, Age of Empires, Spartan and the likes. Before 1998 or so, the only descent game was Civilisation I (and perhaps Colonization). So, not only does one make time to play such games, it is also highly unlikely that 7 people will find an common afternoon to get introduced to a board game, when they can easily setup something quite satisfactory. I agree though that the core players who have stayed on, are really interested in the game. But the bulk of future recruits will have to come from people who have many attractive alternatives. Gregory ___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com