Re: Question about Spain and coasts
Adam Kuehn <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:45:47 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.game-chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06100500be536920c299@[192.168.1.201]> |
Packrat wrote: >Okay folks, a generic question for you all. > >Given a fleet on the SOUTH coast of Spain how would >you, as a GM, rule on each of the following orders: > >1. F Spain (south coast) supports WME to MAO > >2. F Spain supports WME to MAO > >3. F Spain (north coast) supports WME to MAO > >One of those situations came up in a game and I >wondering if I am being unreasonable or not. Assume >Spain and WME both belong to the same country. I require correct coastal designations at all times for fleets already in or moving to a multi-coastal province. Therefore, in my games, only the first of these is valid. I can see a colorable argument for the second one, however, and in the absence of a house rule, I think most GMs would accept it. The third is clearly invalid, unless there are house rules to the contrary. Note that the MHR do include an option to make this a valid order, but in my view, unless the house rules are explicit, it should be disallowed. There is no fleet on the north coast of Spain, and there is no ambiguity in the order. Obviously, Martin disagrees, but that's my take. -Adam