Re: Adjudication Question
Adam Kuehn <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:04:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.gm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p0611041bbdb02b706093@[152.16.15.54]> |
Libby wrote: >Is the support order valid? > >F MAO support F W MED to Spain >F W MED to Spain (SC) What would be the grounds for ruling it invalid? F Wes cannot move to the other Spanish coast, so there is no facial ambiguity to the support order. If F MAO was intending to give any support for that unit's move to Spain, it could only be to Spa(sc). The actual move specified the correct coast explicitly. You'd have to be a True Perfectionist to rule this support invalid. The reverse case would be more interesting, since F MAO could move to either coast, and the owner of F Wes could well care a great deal which coast was meant. Personally, I would rule the support valid without a coast designator, as well, but at least there is a colorable argument. I don't see any dispute in the case you present. It is valid. -Adam ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/7tRolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->