Re: Adjudication question
"Ian Moes" <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:03:23 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.gm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <046701c4c779$7dc529a0$7c600252@PUTIE> |
Hi Jesper, RealPolitik is correct. A unit cannot cut the support for an attack on itself. Cheers Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesper" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:55 PM Subject: [CAT23-GM] Adjudication question > > Hi there > > I've got a situation in the Med... > > Player 1: > F NaF - MAO > F WES S (F NaF - MAO) > F TYS S F WES > > Player 2: > F Spa(sc) S (F MAO - WES) > F MAO - WES > > Realpolitik adjudicates P1:"F NaF - MAO" succeeds, dislodging F MAO. But if > were adjudicating by hand, I would have started by letting the order P2:"F > MAO - WES" cut the support P1:"F NaF - MAO" unsuccesfull. Then, P2:"MAO - > WES" bounces with the P1 fleet in WES (both units supported by one), leaving > everyone where they started... > > Am I or Realpolitik mistaken? > > > :) Jesper > > > > > Community email addresses: > Post message: [email protected] > Subscribe: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > List owner: [email protected] > > Shortcut URL to this page: > http://www.onelist.com/community/CAT23-GM > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/7tRolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->