Re: Clarity of Orders

I am more inclined to think 5 is ambiguous than 6 .  That "s" bothers me.



----- Original Message -----
From: squirelibbymcafee <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:18 am
Subject: [CAT23-GM] Clarity of Orders

> Gentleman, 
> 
> I would be interested in your input on the orders below. All 
> orders 
> are logical regarding the borders between the provinces, meaning 
> they 
> are adjacent and would succeed if not attacked or opposed. The 
> intended actions of the units in orders 5 & 6 are in question.  I 
> am 
> inclined to consider 5 & 6 as ambiguous, given the use of verbs in 
> orders 1-4.
> 
> 
> 1 &#150; "Unit Province C to Province D"
> 2 &#150; "Unit Province E supports Unit Province C to Province D"
> 3 &#150; "Unit Province G to Province H"
> 4 &#150; "Unit Province I supports A Province G to Province H"
> 5 &#150; "Unit Province F to supports Province E"
> 6 &#150; "Unit Province J to support Foreign Country Unit Province Z"
> 
> TY,
> 
> Libby
> 
> wnrytyrsd