Re: Cat23's Very Own Site

Luis <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:52:58 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.new-games
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Certainly. I though that one of the defining characteristics of Cat23 
was human GMing. I even believe that this definition used to be written 
in the old homepage - though my memory may fail in this.

I've never played with a judge but, if like suggested elsewhere, we are 
talking of GMs using a judge as adjudication helper, I see no difference 
between that and using Realpolitik (or any similar adjudicator 
software). Guess it would be a matter of GMs personal preferences, right?

Regards,
Luis.

Cristiano Corte Restituti wrote:

> Deepak, and all, currently there is nothing that impedes a cat23 game 
> be played on the DJudge, let's say, but we don't see those things. 
> Even gunboat plays here are run with human gming. Hm, I would say one 
> cat special characteristic is the old fashioned adjudication method. 
> It brings players into direct mail contact and makes the group feel 
> more a community. CCR.
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> In case you don't have a judge built in already, Manus Hand has an 
> excellent one written in Python - and he provides the code to anyone 
> who wants it. (He used to, anyway).
> Cheers,
> Deepak
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> .
>
>  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]