Re: Cat23's Very Own Site

"David E. Cohen" <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:56:08 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.new-games
Message-ID <003701c889af$d68ee430$6601a8c0@Dell>
There is the Worldmasters judge.  Seems a natural to link to.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Deepak Mohoni" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: [CAT23-Ngame] Cat23's Very Own Site


> There are a number of cat23 games and even (at least one) of the 
> worldmasters that used a judge either for standardised adjudications or 
> for running a gunboat tournament. Of course, the majority of games run 
> with human adjudication.
>
> Would be nicer to have our own judge (as and when required) rather than to 
> use someone else's. With yahoogroups this is of course not possible, but 
> with a website, why not?
>
> At least one of the judges has a point-and-click interface, and those 
> clumsy emailed commands are not needed.
>
> Cheers,
> Deepak
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Luis
>  To: Cristiano Corte Restituti
>  Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected]
>  Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:22 PM
>  Subject: Re: [CAT23-Ngame] Cat23's Very Own Site
>
>
>  Certainly. I though that one of the defining characteristics of Cat23
>  was human GMing. I even believe that this definition used to be written
>  in the old homepage - though my memory may fail in this.
>
>  I've never played with a judge but, if like suggested elsewhere, we are
>  talking of GMs using a judge as adjudication helper, I see no difference
>  between that and using Realpolitik (or any similar adjudicator
>  software). Guess it would be a matter of GMs personal preferences, right?
>
>  Regards,
>  Luis.
>
>  Cristiano Corte Restituti wrote:
>
>  > Deepak, and all, currently there is nothing that impedes a cat23 game
>  > be played on the DJudge, let's say, but we don't see those things.
>  > Even gunboat plays here are run with human gming. Hm, I would say one
>  > cat special characteristic is the old fashioned adjudication method.
>  > It brings players into direct mail contact and makes the group feel
>  > more a community. CCR.
>  >
>  > ----- Original Message ----
>  > In case you don't have a judge built in already, Manus Hand has an
>  > excellent one written in Python - and he provides the code to anyone
>  > who wants it. (He used to, anyway).
>  > Cheers,
>  > Deepak
>  >
>  > __________________________________________________________
>  >
>  > .
>  >
>  >
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  No virus found in this incoming message.
>  Checked by AVG.
>  Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1334 - Release Date: 
> 18-03-2008 20:52
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>