Re: wm02sf02: Austria EGS
"naboimp" <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:23:03 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.worldmasters.results.wm2002 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eelco and all, I just wanted to respond to some of this. Of course, this kind of=20 discussion is precisely why I enjoy reading EOG's. > GERMANY > Right from the start Stephen was in trouble when Italy occupied=20 Tyr and=20 > France moving to Bur. There was no way Germany could keep Mun and=20 France=20 > duly supported Italy in in A01. I'm still a bit puzzled about what=20 happened=20 > next as it was clear Germany needed help from England and Russia=20 but he=20 > somehow upset Russia by helping England against Russia! Italy then=20 got=20 > kicked out of Mun next turn because France didn't support him=20 anymore and it=20 > appeared there was an E/F in the making. I believe I've shown=20 interest in=20 > France moving against Italy then, but am not really sure. In the=20 meanwhile I=20 > think maybe Germany was led to believe he was part of an E/F/G,=20 but that was=20 > soon over as England and Russia took care of him. I don't think=20 Russia=20 > needed convincing to attack Germany. Luckily I was in the=20 neighbourhood=20 > around 1904 to pick up a vital share (Mun) myself and thus staying=20 more=20 > healthy than Italy had hoped for when he planted his first stab in=20 A1904,=20 > again, more on that later. >=20 Yeah, I'm not really sure what Steve was thinking either other than=20 he may have been worried about an FR. Perhaps he thought an EG=20 could propel him back to prominence, but I think he overestimated=20 his usefulness to Justin. You're right that I didn't need=20 convincing to attack Germany after he betrayed me for no apparent=20 gain for himself. In fact, I felt like I was the one doing the=20 convincing as many others worried about England growing too large as=20 Germany fell. I calculated that as long as France held out, there=20 was plenty of time for someone to catch and pass England. > TURKEY > In the meanwhile, Len (Turkey) was making all the right noises for=20 him and=20 > me to turn on Russia in 1902 and as Italy was about to move west=20 (to oppose=20 > France) I agreed to his idea. Especially as Russia was starting to=20 become a=20 > major power by being in Nwy and Swe. Unfortunately that was when=20 my hotmail=20 > account started to play up for the first time and my agreement to=20 go with=20 > the orders as discussed only arrived at Len's inbox several=20 hours 'after'=20 > the adjudication. The same was happening with Paul's (Russia)=20 message to me=20 > about a bounce in Gal. Apparently he didn't want that one anymore,=20 but as I=20 > didn't hear from Len I went ahead with that bounce=85. and there I=20 was, in=20 > Gal. Clearly, this was a mess. Off course as both messages never=20 arrived in=20 > time, and I could prove it, it was not hard for Paul to believe I=20 would move=20 > out of Gal next turn as nothing happened that wasn't agreed with=20 him. For=20 > Len it was a different matter, as a good plan fell down the drain=20 and even=20 > if I could prove about hotmail to him as well, and still be=20 credible enough,=20 > the situation was different. In the meanwhile Italy was with a=20 fleet in the=20 > AEG (as well as sailing west) and things were looking grim for=20 Turkey. >=20 I guess I didn't know about all this (other than the bounce that=20 wasn't in Galicia). All I can say is that I'm glad this plot fell=20 apart as quickly as it did. With Germany's betrayal at the same=20 time, I might have been in serious trouble (though perhaps not as=20 much as might be seen). Certainly, such an attack would have forced=20 me into closer negotiation with Italy, and I still would have made=20 peace with England. In the end, we probably both lucked out that=20 your alliance with Turkey went nowhere. With Jake needing Stan to=20 hold back Justin, he would still likely have turned on you, and with=20 you trying to move on me, you would have had the real two front war=20 that you always avoided this game. (Not to mention that letting Len=20 get any traction in this game may have hurt you in the end.) =20 > STAB 1 > And here comes A1904, Italy immediately grabbed the opportunity (I=20 admit I=20 > was a bit stretched) and stabbed me for the first time. Luckily,=20 coinciding=20 > with Jake's stab I knew France was going to claim Bel and (I=20 believe we=20 > agreed) I took Mun off of France in exchange (as he didn't really=20 need a=20 > build to thwart England, and also to keep the game more balanced,=20 especially=20 > in my area as I was suspecting something to happen in the east. .=20 but I have=20 > to admit I didn't suspect the Italian stab already this turn, good=20 one=20 > Jake!). Anyway, me taking Mun proved to be a life saver! Right=20 there and=20 > then I immediately vowed to all that I would never allow an=20 Italian board=20 > top! Off course Len spotted this as his lifeline and offered his=20 undying=20 > help to me to push Italy back, which off course I accepted (with=20 in the back=20 > of my mind that mishap in 1902). In 1905 I tried to hijack the=20 Italian=20 > ION-fleet by supporting it to Gre and slide into ION myself as I=20 was=20 > thinking Jake would self bounce in Gre. It failed, and Jake told=20 me it was=20 > in the dying seconds he changed the bounce order... Italy then=20 kicked me out=20 > of Ser and I retreated (with Russian agreement) to Russian held=20 Rum. Russia=20 > was about to pick up Ank and he also knew he needed a healthy=20 Austria to=20 > stop Italy. And I promised to hand Rum back to him asap. However,=20 as Turkey=20 > was now becoming very important for 'my' well being I had to try=20 to make=20 > sure he stayed as healthy as possible as well. Unfortunately in=20 the spring=20 > Russia was already in Ank and as Turkey was about to go down from=20 3 to 2 (or=20 > 1 as I wanted Smy for compensation against Italy) Len and I=20 arranged it so=20 > that Russia was kicked out of Ank and that I would land in Smy.=20 Paul asked=20 > for help, but I chose to ignore it and focus on my main worry=20 first, Italy.=20 > Russia would not be jeopardized as he was not in danger, he just=20 didn't get=20 > that build, and secondly, it was also more in the interest of=20 keeping the=20 > game balanced. A build for Russia would be in Stp or War and both=20 were not=20 > in my interest (when looking at the balance side of things.=20 Remember I was=20 > Austria between Italy who was not allowed to attack France and=20 Russia who=20 > could not allow England to grow, but at the same time I didn't=20 want him to=20 > grow either). In 1905 I kept Mun and Rum (still by agreement),=20 took Smy and=20 > gambled on keeping Bud empty for the all important build, and I=20 got it!=20 > Italy was on 7, I was on 6, Turkey was helping me and Russia=20 retreated. Not=20 > bad at all... >=20 Ah, my short-lived stay in Turkey! Of course, I wasn't too happy=20 with either of my so-called allies after that year since neither of=20 you gave me the support I needed when I needed it. For Jake, this=20 was probably a huge error in retrospect. Why? Because I blamed him=20 more for my failures in Turkey. Eelco did have to defend himself=20 from Jake, and I found this a more palatable excuse than Jake's=20 desire to grab centers from Eelco as fast as he could. I think a=20 healthy Russia grateful to Italy, especially at Turkey's expense=20 would have been a very good thing for Italy at this juncture.=20=20 Instead, I was forced to sue for peace with Turkey, and my heart was=20 just not into dismantling Austria when I would get few of the gains=20 compared with Jake. By getting "greedy", Italy cost himself aid=20 that may well have helped him later. > STATUS QUO > In the years 1906 and 1907 things started to consolidate. I handed=20 Rum back=20 > to Russia, Italy never got anywhere anymore against me thanks to=20 an NMR,=20 > coordination between Len and me, but also very importantly, thanks=20 to a=20 > friendly Russia (and off course England threatening to run away=20 with the=20 > game). Other matters of importance, Italy sends a fleet west to=20 help France=20 > against England, England accidentally takes Mun off of me, and=20 although I=20 > went down to 5 because of it, it did more harm to England as this=20 was=20 > positionally definitely NOT the place to be at this stage. A stage=20 where=20 > everyone started to combine against him as he was about to run=20 away with the=20 > game. And surely by A1907 Italy was in Mun, Russia threatened Kie=20 and France=20 > was about to take Bel. So, England was kicked out of Mun. . . . I=20 then saw=20 > the danger of 1904 loom again, with Turkey on the verge of=20 elimination (and=20 > not being able to help me anymore) and being in the middle of I/R.=20 And so I=20 > asked Justin to retreat Mun to Boh to keep I/R at bay, or maybe=20 even having=20 > this unit to help me against I/R. And not surprisingly, both I/R=20 wanted that=20 > army out of the way asap and made suggestions that would finish it=20 off=20 > immediately. But I did not help out (told them so) and 'defended'=20 against a=20 > possible stab. But to keep them happy I kept helping pushing=20 Turkey back in=20 > his corner, again by supporting Italy and in return I again got=20 support to=20 > Bul. >=20 Yes, Justin's "good fortune" changed things around again as I felt=20 compelled to stab him even though by this time, I felt more=20 comfortable trusting him than I did either Eelco or Jake. That=20 Bohemia army was a major irritant, and I was exasperated that=20 Austria wasn't helping destroy it. I think I arranged with Jake=20 that next season to leave Vienna as the only possible retreat so=20 that Austria was forced to aid in the English army's destruction. On the contrary, I wasn't happy at all about Austrian cooperation=20 with Italy to take out Turkey. After I sued for peace and Len was=20 willing to concentrate westwards, I would have preferred Turkey=20 remain viable. Unfortunately, the tactical situation left me=20 extremely thin, particularly in the south, and the diplomatic=20 situation meant I couldn't turn on Eelco without excess advantages=20 to Jake. As a result, my sympathies for Len's situation produced no=20 fruit. > JW > Then after S9108 I was about to embark on an unexpected vacation=20 and I had=20 > to look for a replacement for 2 turns. A08 and S09. I already used=20 up my=20 > extension time somewhere in march/april because of important=20 private=20 > matters. And as I met JW (Jan Willem Omlo) for the first time=20 shortly=20 > before, when I invited him on a BBQ, and as he was our team=20 captain, I asked=20 > him. Off course he felt he couldn't say no after the BBQ-fiesta! I=20 told him=20 > what was up, that he should keep wary of Jake, that I intended to=20 > disentangle with Italy more (after 1904 we were still entangled!)=20 by=20 > supporting all of Italy to Turkey and let me have the rest of the=20 Balkans. I=20 > told him about the strategic importance of the English army in Boh=20 and when=20 > I came back JW secured my build, but the english army in Boh was=20 gone (not=20 > so bad), but unfortunately Italy had stabbed me again (S1909)!=20 Still, JW got=20 > me back up to 7 again and the situation was salvageable I thought.=20 Great Job=20 > JW! >=20 > STAB 2 > But anyway, big *sigh*. So there I was AGAIN, the english army in=20 Boh was=20 > gone and what I had feared happened immediately. Italy pays=20 another visit!=20 > BUT, as I thought that Russia would then join in, he didn't??? He=20 left Jake=20 > hanging (Paul being the alliance player he is, or out of self=20 interest?),=20 > which I'm sure was not very much appreciated by Jake. Okay, Russia=20 had other=20 > worries in the north as his campaign in Scandinavia was not=20 getting anywhere=20 > (wrong gamble) but he did land Mun. Although I knew I could not=20 trust Jake,=20 > he was then willing to talk about disentangling again.... still I=20 had to=20 > retreat Ser, and again Rum was the option. I received a lot of=20 pushing to do=20 > so by everyone, except by Russia off course. I did anyway as I=20 needed that=20 > build once more as compensation so Italy would not get it into his=20 head to=20 > stab me for the 3rd time. And I mentioned to Russia that I would=20 hand it=20 > back again like I did after the first stab. I subsequently managed=20 to free=20 > Tri and I build a fleet (much to annoyance to Italy, but hey...=20 with two=20 > knives in my back who can blame me! And I thought that would keep=20 him in=20 > line). This was A1909 and that same turn coincided with maybe the=20 most=20 > important move in the game (as sort of part of a deal with me=20 retreating to=20 > Rum), Italian F(WMS) - Spa sc, effectively stabbing France! Jake=20 told me=20 > Stan would not mind as he had offered Spa a few turns earlier, but=20 > apparently Stan took it VERY badly and moved away from England to=20 fight=20 > Italy. >=20 I had all kinds of options available to me that season when Jake=20 stabbed Austria the second time, and I seriously considered all of=20 them. I had little faith in Austria by this point and very little=20 contact with JW as the Austrian replacement. In fact, Austrian=20 cooperation with Italy against Turkey was extremely displeasing, and=20 I really wanted the two of them fighting again. I did consider=20 joining in with Jake against Austria, but there was no way that I=20 could fight both Austria and England at the same time. Thus, at the same time that I was discussing the stab opportunity=20 with Jake, I was also discussing peace with Justin. Justin's=20 defense choice was to block me so I didn't anticipate getting many=20 gains if any in the north from that point on (although I did have a=20 50/50 chance against Sweden that I subsequently misguessed on).=20=20 Justin was being pushed back by France and Italy in Germany so I=20 thought he might go for it, and since I had a much better=20 relationship with Justin at that point than anyone else (despite our=20 war), I definitely leaned toward peace. On my own, I considered a stab of Italy for Munich, and in fact this=20 was part of my discussions with Justin. I realized that if I set=20 Jake up to stab Austria and then didn't help, I might get the war=20 between the two that I desired while limiting the success of Jake's=20 stab so that stalemate would prevail. Meanwhile, I could nab Munich=20 for myself and be in much better position to move onward. In the end, I decided to stab Jake while forgoing peace with=20 Justin. Why? It was Stan. I couldn't hope to keep Munich against=20 both France and Italy so I hoped to get Stan willing to work with me=20 despite my move on Jake, and to do that, I had to keep the pressure=20 up against Justin. Why attack Jake? Well, the stab of Austria=20 would have netted me a center or two, but it would have given Jake=20 all of Turkey and most of the Balkans with me fairly unable to=20 defend my new territories should Jake want them. And Jake refused=20 to support me into Vienna in the spring, instead requiring yet again=20 that he gain first - an unfortunate reminder of similar "greed" when=20 I failed in my attack on Turkey. Not trusting Austria at all, I=20 simply allowed the stab to go on, hoping that Austria would defend=20 itself adequately (which he didn't). I have trouble believing that Eelco talked Jake into attacking=20 Spain. I wonder how that would have played in the final=20 negotiations? Obviously, it put the final nail in Jake's winning=20 chances, but it also got the hammer and nail ready for mine. With=20 France unable to help me in Germany, I could not hope to make=20 progress against England, and I was actually more worried at the=20 time about Italian chances. It was a mistake not to cover Rumania that fall when I knew Austria=20 was being attacked, but I was concerned about the Turk fleet in=20 Black Sea trying to nab one of my centers in desperation, and I=20 expected Sevastopol to be the more likely to be attacked. The=20 failure to cover Rumania might have made a difference - I don't=20 really know. Since I saw my only chance to win as being with=20 Austrian cooperation at this point, I was much more generous with my=20 tactics than I should have been. > E-COUNT > The situation. France was about to embark on a sort of suicide=20 mission=20 > against Italy. England was about to get significant gains which=20 should kill=20 > of any hopes Russia, Italy or I would've had to achieve boardtop.=20 That is=20 > unless someone was to throw centers rapidly to anyone else. With=20 my retreat=20 > to Rum earlier I was thinking Russia was going to count on me=20 throwing=20 > things to him, but I was wondering if he would do the same for me.=20 Sure, he=20 > told me he would, and who knows maybe even Jake would! Anyway,=20 England was=20 > heading for additional centers in France and Iberia and I'm sure=20 Russia=20 > would've tried to thwart me throwing centers to Italy as much as=20 Italy=20 > wanted to thwart me throwing centers to Russia. In that light=20 maybe I=20 > should've gone for the gentlemens approach, using this thought=20 about Jake=20 > and Paul not granting eachother the victory and that they might=20 both have=20 > been okay with throwing centers to me, but it was just a little=20 too much=20 > counting on 2 others who would want to allow me this, 'especially'=20 as we all=20 > could live with the fact that Justin would take boardtop! Anyway,=20 Jake=20 > suggested a bizar deal a turn earlier and I didn't embrace it=20 eagerly then.=20 > But I slept it over for a week or so. Evaluating the situation I=20 began to=20 > think more and more it was an unconventional way for me to take=20 boardtop=20 > afterall ... But...what if I lost the e-count deal? Then what=20 about my=20 > messages, after Italian stab 1 and in future turns, to all the=20 others that I=20 > would never allow Italy to get boardtop? I calculated that even=20 with me=20 > throwing centers to Jake, Stan would start throwing centers to=20 Justin as=20 > easily, as Stan would never allow an Italian win either. And I'm=20 sure Russia=20 > would feel betrayed as well and maybe (if necessary) hand England=20 any=20 > necessary centers to beat Jake... Bottom line, Jake would probably=20 never=20 > beat Justin to boardtop, so I could always agree to the deal=20 knowing it was=20 > then me or Justin winning this thing. >=20 I agree with your analysis of Jake's chances at this point. He was=20 not going to win over Justin if that was the choice. Still, I may=20 have fared better had you lost this E-count thing. I hesitated a=20 season too long in moving south and so lost the positional advantage=20 I might have had. (I considered attacking into Tyrolia for instance=20 and moving into Galicia.) But any move southward would be a choice=20 to show myself for Justin and ruin any meager hopes I had for=20 turning things around to my benefit. By holding onto that dream a=20 season too long, I made it so I could not oppose the late Austrian=20 charge except by defending what I had and giving what was left to=20 Justin. Paul of Russia ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->=20 Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/xTHqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->=20 =20