Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon
SP-NTX -FlightGear <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMUHL_Hyc7iZ=kxN=tFqCA9TTM7SJMTWU10V-uyopVYa48D8Ag@mail.gmail.com> |
I made 100 aircrafts called blue-yellow-glider[1-100], they are all different and should be added as separate aircrafts, also I rate them 6/5 What I mean by this is why in the hell you consider FGAddon being a sandbox the only viable option? I would perfectly understand it had it been the only easy option to download/host aircraft. Nowadays there are more tutorials on how to download aircraft from github gitlab etc. and I believe almost everyone has flown in aircraft downloaded from outside the FGAddon. By having *any* kind of guidelines for FGAddon other than "do whatever you want #freedom as long as GNU GPL' it would dramatically improve the end user experience. Someone made some Code of Conduct of FG a few days ago where it is PRECISELY differentiated between the contributors/users role in the project. Some of you for some reason can not see the end user perspective, despite the fact I clearly stated it in the first post. Let's be real, no one will do anything about the issue whatsoever. You know what? Give me the commit access to FGAddon, I can rate the aircrafts, all of them. I have no heart whatsoever, I go by guidelines only, even if it means giving 1/5 rating. If we want a rating to solve the issue: 1. Ratings have to be visible on the aircraft browsing page, not only after clicking it. 2. There needs to be a visible label whether the aircraft is Yasim or JSBSim. One could argue they won't understand, trust me when they see aircraft with (Yasim) in the name after some time they understand to avoid it. 3. New rating requirements need to be made, focusing more on realism, even if current 4/5 FDM aircraft will become 2 FGAddon on flightgear wiki is regarded as the official FlightGear Hangar. Why do you think turning it into a complete sandbox is a viable option? Regards, SP-NTX _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel