Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon

I question a judgement of realism by anyone who hasn't flown the real plane
being simulated.
Regards, Frank

On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 10:13 AM eatdirt via Flightgear-devel <
[email protected]> wrote:

> My 10 years-old son has essentially tried all of them, including the
> citroen, the jeep etc... He does not care about the FDM, he's just
> enjoying to fly them. How more innocent can he be? He is just
> complaining when the plane does not work or when it crashes flightgear.
> Oh, we have a ticket system to try fixing that!
>
> You want good FDM, most realistic aircrafts? Well, you're already not
> innocent anymore then, and I guess you would have no difficulties to
> understand which ones are most realistic.
>
>
> Concerning what *might appear* useless, obsolete etc... Well, that's
> completely suggestive. I've found not so long ago the RASCAL 110, with
> its wheels rolling under the ground. Guess what? I've fixed it, wrote an
> RCview add module, and that's my favorite plane to train my remote
> control skills with a real remote control, on flightgear!!!
>
> So, sorry to completely disagree with your opinion.
>
> Nice troll though ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Chris.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel