Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon

Who said the community doesn't strive to make this the best, most 
diverse, most realistic simulator out there? That is my goal. Just 
because some model something less perfect doesn't mean that isn't the 
ultimate goal. How does including or offering some sub prime content, 
take away fromn that? It's value added content.

On 5/22/2026 12:09 PM, David Hudach wrote:
> I guess I look at it this way. If the intent isn't to make FG a 
> realistic flight simulator, then why put all of the time and effort 
> into realistic scenery, live weather, accurate instrumentation and 
> data (GPS, VOR, etc). Why not just call it a game and be done with it. 
> Why put in all the work to model the real world on just about every 
> level except for the actual airplane itself for which FG exists?