Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon

Couldn't agree more with the OP.

The ratings are a joke.
No complaints with Helijahs work that I have greatly enjoyed in over 20
years of using FG. It is what it is and he provides a good starting point
for other developers. I sincerely thank him for his prodigious efforts over
the decades.
However I do not think his work should be front and centre in the default
hanger as the OP says, it gives an overall negative impression to a new
user.
OR put them in another hangar called Gamer or something like that, just
make it clear these are for fun or further development and not indicative
of a proper simulation aircraft.


Regards

On Fri, 22 May 2026, 16:50 Alan Teeder, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry, but for many users Flightgear  *IS* a game.
>
> For me Flightgear is a flight simulator, but I consider myself probably in
> a minority.
>
> Alan
> On 22/05/2026 16:36, David Hudach wrote:
>
> Personally, this is inappropriate for this discussion: *Nice troll though
> ;)*
>
>
> Flightgear-devel mailing [email protected]://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel