Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon
SP-NTX -FlightGear <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMUHL_G6mKq=KcnFws5pG=c4o7irG2ocqjdnXL0cDyyGD+3nGQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I believe it is necessary to distinguish between "fun" planes and counter-realistic placeholder-level aircraft. sob., 23 maj 2026 o 15:32 gallonf&z <[email protected]> napisał(a): > The first plane a new user encounters is the Cessna 172...' > > On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 7:19 AM An Phúc Nguyễn Vạn < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The idea is that we never hides the fun aircraft. but recommend the best >> out of FG addon for users >> >> Vào Thứ 7, 23 thg 5, 2026 vào lúc 19:07 An Phúc Nguyễn Vạn < >> [email protected]> đã viết: >> >>> I suggest we could have a UI for a curated list of the best aircraft in >>> realism, and recommend it to newcomers so they don't get lost in the vast >>> selection we offer and have a great impression with flight gear! >>> >>> Vào Thứ 7, 23 thg 5, 2026 vào lúc 18:52 Willie Fleming < >>> [email protected]> đã viết: >>> >>>> Couldn't agree more with the OP. >>>> >>>> The ratings are a joke. >>>> No complaints with Helijahs work that I have greatly enjoyed in over 20 >>>> years of using FG. It is what it is and he provides a good starting point >>>> for other developers. I sincerely thank him for his prodigious efforts over >>>> the decades. >>>> However I do not think his work should be front and centre in the >>>> default hanger as the OP says, it gives an overall negative impression to a >>>> new user. >>>> OR put them in another hangar called Gamer or something like that, just >>>> make it clear these are for fun or further development and not indicative >>>> of a proper simulation aircraft. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> On Fri, 22 May 2026, 16:50 Alan Teeder, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sorry, but for many users Flightgear *IS* a game. >>>>> >>>>> For me Flightgear is a flight simulator, but I consider myself >>>>> probably in a minority. >>>>> >>>>> Alan >>>>> On 22/05/2026 16:36, David Hudach wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Personally, this is inappropriate for this discussion: *Nice troll >>>>> though ;)* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Flightgear-devel mailing [email protected]://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Flightgear-devel mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Flightgear-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Flightgear-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel