Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon
James Turner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 27 May 2026, at 10:54, Willie Fleming <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its a volunteer project and Im not volunteering to put up with those attitudes to try make the place a little more welcomi g and user friendly. I wish you luck but you are dealing with too many hidebound grumpy old guys who are enjoying their own little circle jerk. > Shame cos its a really good simulator crippled by crap documentation and crappier attitudes. Please do remember, everyone contributing is doing this for fun : possibly Type 2 fun, but still. It’s very easy to suggest things which are sensible, but which are in fact, /work/, not fun. Everyone has a different idea what fun and work look like, but complaining that someone else’s definition, is the reason you won’t contribute, seems like a self-defeating argument. The thing that counts is *doing stuff* (which largely means commits / fixes to code / aircraft / docs / the website. As opposed to ’talking about stuff’ here / on the forum. So if you want to complain how bad the docs are, I’ll take your comments a lot more seriously when you’ve made 20+ commits to: https://gitlab.com/flightgear/documentation Now, maybe that’s *not* fun for you, so it won’t happen, but that’s entirely under your control : no one else’s attitude is stopping you doing that :) Kind regards, James _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel