Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon
James Turner <[email protected]> Fri, 29 May 2026 12:39:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 29 May 2026, at 12:27, [email protected] wrote: > > So MP users / by ACFT higher than the ground in time/ACFT would return a quite impartial reading of 'accepted/acceptable' ACFT. But only for people who use MP, which is not representative, as far as we currently know. My actual plan for this is to integrate OpenTelemetry and use the GitLab OpenTelemetry backend to collect this data (with another consent box on FirstRun.qml), and probably some other stats as well: weather mode, starting airport, anything else that is anonymous but might be useful for feature planning. And yes session time vs in-air time vs landings (WoW going from 0 -> 1 with debounce) are relevant metrics here, I suspect we have a lot more takeoffs than landings :) Kind regards, James _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel