Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon

Fabiano Notari <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Jun 2026 03:24:43 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.games.flightgear.devel
Message-ID <CAK+yO5=AdZCq7jDsebM_9xvLyzg0Np-kRhx4t_=720w9GJE3dA@mail.gmail.com>
A question:
Why not use the forum for topics like this and leave this mailing list for
development?
Best regards,
Fabiano

Il giorno ven 29 mag 2026 alle ore 13:40 James Turner <[email protected]>
ha scritto:

>
>
> On 29 May 2026, at 12:27, [email protected] wrote:
>
> So MP users / by ACFT higher than the ground in time/ACFT would return a
> quite impartial reading of 'accepted/acceptable' ACFT.
>
>
> But only for people who use MP, which is not representative, as far as we
> currently know.
>
> My actual plan for this is to integrate OpenTelemetry and use the GitLab
> OpenTelemetry backend to collect this data (with another consent box on
> FirstRun.qml), and probably some other stats as well: weather mode,
> starting airport, anything else that is anonymous but might be useful for
> feature planning.
>
> And yes session time vs in-air time vs landings (WoW going from 0 -> 1
> with debounce) are relevant metrics here, I suspect we have a lot more
> takeoffs than landings :)
>
> Kind regards,
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel