Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon
Fabiano Notari <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Jun 2026 03:24:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK+yO5=AdZCq7jDsebM_9xvLyzg0Np-kRhx4t_=720w9GJE3dA@mail.gmail.com> |
A question: Why not use the forum for topics like this and leave this mailing list for development? Best regards, Fabiano Il giorno ven 29 mag 2026 alle ore 13:40 James Turner <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > On 29 May 2026, at 12:27, [email protected] wrote: > > So MP users / by ACFT higher than the ground in time/ACFT would return a > quite impartial reading of 'accepted/acceptable' ACFT. > > > But only for people who use MP, which is not representative, as far as we > currently know. > > My actual plan for this is to integrate OpenTelemetry and use the GitLab > OpenTelemetry backend to collect this data (with another consent box on > FirstRun.qml), and probably some other stats as well: weather mode, > starting airport, anything else that is anonymous but might be useful for > feature planning. > > And yes session time vs in-air time vs landings (WoW going from 0 -> 1 > with debounce) are relevant metrics here, I suspect we have a lot more > takeoffs than landings :) > > Kind regards, > James > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel