Re: (PR#10078) AIs often agress on cease fire just for one turn

"Benoit Hudson" <bh-0/DuvcfrMH9wGe/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.freeciv.ai
Message-ID <[email protected]>
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=10078 >

On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 08:56:14AM -0700, Mateusz Stefek wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=10078 >
> 
> > [jdorje - Mon Sep 13 15:43:36 2004]:
> 
> > It looks like this means the AI is more likely to break an alliance than 
> > a ceasefire agreement.
> I think this should be true.

If you mean that this is desirable behaviour, you have a very odd
interpretation of what a cease-fire is.  The real-world use of
cease-fires is basically for both sides to regroup, and possibly reach a
peace settlement, but likely just go back at it again in a little while.

It should be easy to get a cease-fire, and cheap (reputation-wise) to
break it.

        -- Benoît
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.