[freeciv-data] Re: Re: Alternative nation dialog
Reinier Post <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.freeciv.data |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 06:56:10AM -0400, Mark Metson wrote: > Actually I dont like the whole "gold" concept very much. Like too many > games it arbitrarily assumes currency even before currency has been > developed. That isn't worth fixing because you can't get much gold at the start. Gold stands for "currency", it's just a shorter word. > I suspect that the value of such things as gold in particular > is really that it is a luxury. No, it is a means to simplify trade once there is a serious economy. > It is unlikely to be of much value to > people who do not have the basics of survival. Yes, if you add a pre-trade phase to Freeciv gold becomes a questionable entity. > Only once they have their > basic survival and are looking for mating ritual advantages and cosmetics > / jewelry (mating rituals again) is gold likely to become of much use. This is not "gold" in Freeciv, it is "luxury". -- Reinier