[freeciv-data] Tech and Ancient Units

Thanasis Kinias <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.freeciv.data
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Starting with the ancient land units, we have:

Warriors (1/1/1) $10
Phalanx  (1/2/1) $20, req. Bronze Working
Horsemen (2/1/2) $20, req. Horseback Riding
Archers  (3/2/1) $30, req. Warrior Code

Right from the beginning, I don't see what the connection is between the
phalanx and bronze working.  What makes a phalanx different from
warriors is not bronze tips to spears, but the level of organization.
For a phalanx to work, a supply of free men with military training is
necessary.  That suggests an association with some level of government,
either republic or monarchy (or both).  I would suggest the republic.

The point at which the phalanx becomes a legion is the point at which it
becomes a professional army, as opposed to a body of citizen-warriors.
Again, it has nothing to do with ironworking.

Horsemen requiring Horseback Riding is a no-brainer.  From what I know
of ancient warfare, however, that comes _after_ charioteers, not before.

And Warrior Code doesn't seem to have any connection to archery.  I
would suggest that Archery ought to permit Archers.  Warrior Code seems
to be a dead-end anyway.

At the next `tier':

Chariot  (3/1/2) $30, req. The Wheel
Legion   (4/2/1) $40, req. Iron Working
Catapult (6/1/1) $40, req. Mathematics

The appearance of the Chariot and Horsemen ought to be reversed, as I
mentioned.  The Horsemen ought to have the same firepower as Warriors,
but with greater mobility.  The historical cost relationship, BTW, seems
to be that horse cav costs about 3-4 times what footmen cost to upkeep.

The Legion, as mentioned above, is nothing more than a highly-trained,
professional phalanx with improved tactical and strategic mobility.  The
tech prerequisite should be Professional Army or something like that.
In Freeciv terms, it ought to be nothing more than a Phalanx with better
stats.

Catapults I have to agree with, generally.  The combat model prevents
artillery (ancient or modern) from being employed properly, but that's a
different issue.

So. . .  a first set of ideas on the ancient units.  Comments?


-- 
Thanasis Kinias
Web Developer, Information Technology
Graduate Student, Department of History
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.

Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul,
Ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.