[freeciv-data] Tech and Ancient Units
Thanasis Kinias <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.freeciv.data |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Starting with the ancient land units, we have: Warriors (1/1/1) $10 Phalanx (1/2/1) $20, req. Bronze Working Horsemen (2/1/2) $20, req. Horseback Riding Archers (3/2/1) $30, req. Warrior Code Right from the beginning, I don't see what the connection is between the phalanx and bronze working. What makes a phalanx different from warriors is not bronze tips to spears, but the level of organization. For a phalanx to work, a supply of free men with military training is necessary. That suggests an association with some level of government, either republic or monarchy (or both). I would suggest the republic. The point at which the phalanx becomes a legion is the point at which it becomes a professional army, as opposed to a body of citizen-warriors. Again, it has nothing to do with ironworking. Horsemen requiring Horseback Riding is a no-brainer. From what I know of ancient warfare, however, that comes _after_ charioteers, not before. And Warrior Code doesn't seem to have any connection to archery. I would suggest that Archery ought to permit Archers. Warrior Code seems to be a dead-end anyway. At the next `tier': Chariot (3/1/2) $30, req. The Wheel Legion (4/2/1) $40, req. Iron Working Catapult (6/1/1) $40, req. Mathematics The appearance of the Chariot and Horsemen ought to be reversed, as I mentioned. The Horsemen ought to have the same firepower as Warriors, but with greater mobility. The historical cost relationship, BTW, seems to be that horse cav costs about 3-4 times what footmen cost to upkeep. The Legion, as mentioned above, is nothing more than a highly-trained, professional phalanx with improved tactical and strategic mobility. The tech prerequisite should be Professional Army or something like that. In Freeciv terms, it ought to be nothing more than a Phalanx with better stats. Catapults I have to agree with, generally. The combat model prevents artillery (ancient or modern) from being employed properly, but that's a different issue. So. . . a first set of ideas on the ancient units. Comments? -- Thanasis Kinias Web Developer, Information Technology Graduate Student, Department of History Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A. Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, Ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul