[freeciv-data] Re: (PR#3597) german ruleset new version

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:25:22PM +0100, Daniel Herding wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This ruleset includes Wuppertal, Barmen and Elberfeld.
> 
> But in fact, in 1929 Barmen and Elberfeld were united, creating
> Wuppertal. Today, they're city quarters of Wuppertal. That's why
> I think Barmen and Elberfeld shouldn't be included in german.ruleset.
> 
> http://www.martin-wuppertal.de/wuppertal/wuppertal_geschichte002.html
> For the people who can read German.

Yes, I know this. But at some time long ago when I wanted to change it
people complained for reasons I do not remember.

There is also a problem with Klostergrab, which AFAICS refers to a city
which is *not* on the territory of today's germany, even when there is
a(nother) city by that name near Dresden; the latter one too small and
unimportant to be included in Freeciv.

Time to remove the trash. Patch applied. Thanks for pointing out.

Christian

-- 
Christian Knoke     * * *      http://www.enter.de/~c.knoke/
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.

--- german.ruleset.orig	Fri Apr  4 20:12:22 2003
+++ german.ruleset	Fri Apr  4 20:12:46 2003
@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@
   "Rosheim (forest, hills, !ocean)",
   "Schmalkalden (forest, hills, !ocean)",
   "Lutter (forest, hills)",
-  "Barmen (grassland, plains, hills, river)",
   "Wiesloch (forest, hills, river, !ocean)",
   "Rosslau (grassland, plains, river)",
   "Minden (grassland, hills, swamp, river)",
@@ -156,6 +155,4 @@
   "Philippsburg (grassland, forest, hills, !ocean)",
   "Halberstadt (plains, hills)",
   "Bad Hersfeld (forest, hills)",
-  "Altenburg (forest, hills, !ocean)",
-  "Klostergrab",
-  "Elberfeld (grassland, plains, hills, river)"
+  "Altenburg (forest, hills, !ocean)"